Fridon Injia – My attitude towards the draft law on de-oligarchization is strongly radical

🔹"My attitude towards the project of the Law on Deoligarchization is strongly negative."

The chairman of the parliamentary political group "European Socialists" Fridon Injia announced this at the meeting of the Legal Affairs Committee of the Parliament of Georgia, where the chairman of the committee Anri Okhanashvili presented the draft law of Georgia "On Deoligarchization".

❓. Based on the Constitution of Georgia, this law is anti-constitutional;

❓Wouldn't it be better to wait for the conclusion of the Venice Commission and then make the appropriate decision?

❓A person, any citizen, who is guaranteed the freedom of assembly by the constitution, is restricted by this law (Article 21);

❓ The definition of the oligarch himself is vague. I don't know if this is good or bad.

❓ Elon Musk, who may be nominated for the presidency in 2024 in the United States, if such a law is passed, will he be removed and no more?

❓ Is there a similar law in any successful country?

❓ The Venice Commission will consider the Ukrainian law, and it will probably be in line with the Ukrainian constitution. Our constitution is different from the constitution of Ukraine, that's why the parliament made a number of changes in it. what comes out The law adopted in Ukraine and based on the provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine, and in what respect will this law be consistent, with the Constitution of Ukraine or with the Constitution of Georgia?

❓ A citizen is restricted from fair procedural rights (Article 31 of the Constitution), an appeal, that is, we enter a person in some register, we do not know whether it is good or bad, for whom it is good and for whom it is bad, and he has no right to appeal this fact;

❓ Another issue – for example, we started to discuss, various proposals came in and it turned out that one of the oligarchs (which I don't know is good or bad) who lives abroad, what should this law do to a citizen who owns a company, voting rights, media means from abroad, finances them, etc. How can this law affect this person, will anything change?

❓ Also minor issues - the case of having a father's name. For example, for me this is an insult. Every Georgian has a father's name...

❓ "having significant influence"; Here are such terms and sentences in this law. Who decided what was important and what wasn't? Here, for example, we have the gold stock 1%, could it be a significant influencer? Could the 51% be needed? Or who determines it in these actions? What is the effective or significant influence? Whether you want it - "must buy and take part in the auction" or in the process of privatization of a large-scale object. What is this large-scale facility? Who defined it and by whose definition are we writing a large-scale object here? It can be one for Ukraine, another for Turkey, which one is for us?

❓ Here are a number of sentences that are not clear. Do we want such a thing? what is the goal Therefore, my attitude towards the project of the "Law on Deoligarchization" is strongly negative.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these <abbr title="HyperText Markup Language">HTML</abbr> tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*